Core assumptions
Tip: Leave costs in if you want to show payback. If you want a pure benefit-only view, set them to 0.
Labour control levers
Include geofencing uplift (optional)
Adds a small boost to minutes saved, to reflect tighter enforcement.
Geofencing was discussed as a near-term update. Toggle on if you want to show an upside scenario.
Supplier and PO control levers
This reflects “No PO, no payment” discipline and cleaner PO workflow from modelling.
Invoice processing automation levers
If you do not want to show tool costs, set this to 0.
Results
Annual benefit
£0
Sum of labour, overtime, supplier, off-PO and invoice admin savings.
Annual costs (subscription + automation)
£0
Subscription and automation costs only (implementation treated separately).
Net annual impact
£0
Annual benefit minus annual costs.
Payback period (months)
N/A
Includes implementation + annualised monthly running costs.
| Lever | Annual value |
|---|---|
| Labour leakage reduction (minutes per day) | £0 |
| Overtime reduction | £0 |
| Supplier overcharge prevention | £0 |
| Off-PO spend control | £0 |
| Invoice processing time saved | £0 |
| Total benefit | £0 |
Notes:
- This model focuses on hard, defensible levers that were explicitly discussed: labour verification, overtime control, PO discipline, invoice matching and supplier discrepancies.
- If you want a revenue capacity lever (more installs per week), add a “capacity” section and price it as contribution margin, not turnover.